I've always been interested in the fate of mammals that have become extinct within the timespan of human occupation on the planet, and one of the most intriguing of these cases is the Tasmanian Tiger or Thylacine, a unique marsupial carnivore from Australasia that some die-hards reckon still lingers on in the vast reaches of the outback...
But recent news reveals that we may not even have to keep our fingers crossed about their existence any more. Because one group of scientists have succeeded in "resurrecting" the Thylacine's gene:
Scientists said Tuesday they had "resurrected" a gene from the extinct Tasmanian tiger by implanting it in a mouse, raising the future possibility of bringing animals such as dinosaurs back to life.
In what they describe as a world first, researchers from Australian and U.S. universities extracted a gene from a preserved specimen of the dog-like marsupial - formally known as a thylacine - and revived it in a mouse embryo.
"This is the first time that DNA from an extinct species has been used to induce a functional response in another living organism," said research leader Andrew Pask of the University of Melbourne.
The announcement was hailed as raising the possibility of recreating extinct animals. Mike Archer, dean of science at the University of New South Wales, who led an attempt to clone the thylacine when he was director of the Australian Museum, called it "one very significant step in that direction." "I'm personally convinced this is going to happen," he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. "I've got another group working on another extinct Australian animal and we think this is highly probable."
"We hope that with advances in techniques that maybe one day that might be possible, but certainly as science stands at the moment, we are not able to do that, unfortunately," he said.
Well I'm not so sure that is so unfortunate. Although I do agree with the notion of say bringing back species that were lost because of our own human intervention - i.e. the Thylacine, or the Passenger Pigeon, or the Dodo - its an entirely different ballgame to dabble in the DNA of groups of creatures for which the Earth is just not suited for any more.
Where on Earth would you house a pack of marauding T-rexs? And what kind of food provisions would you have to make for a herd of ravenous Diplodicus?
Are we really ready to deal with such collosal heachaches when we are already making a mess of trying to mamage our present day environment???
7 comments:
I hope advances in science would on day help in the restoration of exptinct species
I'm not sure having Dinosaurs around would be a good idea. Have you ever seen Jurassic Park???? But I would like to see a dodo, a passenger pigeon and a Tasmanian tiger around again.
Good, I love animals, and the tasmanian tiger looks really cool. I agree with the anynonmous person that said dinosaurs wouldn't be good to bring back, I have seen jurassic park.
Hey there Steven Spielberg I don't mean to buzzkill but there's a slight problem with your theory.On one hand Mammoth remains preserved in the Siberian permafrost have yielded DNA from 50,000 to 100,000 years ago, on the other hand preservation of DNA more than 100,000 years old is thought to be unlikely. And since dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago I'm pretty comfident we have no chance of bringing those once magestic beasts back to life.
You're welcome.
Hey there previous commentator, did you need the snark to make that point?
It would be nice if the Tasmanian Tiger came back, but I don't think its possible.
i dont think we should meddle with the species anymore then we already have. yes it would be cool but once we open those doors, i dont think we'd be ready to close them.
Post a Comment